5/28/2023 0 Comments Elucidate in a sentence![]() Refer to evidence and examples where appropriate.Įg. To specify in clear terms the key aspects pertaining to a topic without being overly descriptive. ‘Globalisation is generally said to promote cultural homogenisation but due to this cultural specificities appear to be strengthened in the Indian society.’ Elucidate. The Self Help Group (SHG) Bank Linkage Program (SBLP), which is India’s own innovation, has proved to be one of the most effective poverty alleviation and women empowerment programme. In such cases, we have to basically bring out the linkage more clearly citing evidence and examples.Įg. In several of the questions, where the examiners use this directive, they present us with a cause-effect linkage asking us to ‘elucidate’. For example, this could be done by making an argument or topic more clear by explaining it in simpler terms. This means to provide insight into a subject, and quite literally, provide clarification. >Simplification based Descriptive directives Just remember that the key objective here is to give a nuanced account of a research topic or argument by examining its composite parts. That is, you should give an overview of all viewpoints before providing any of your own arguments.Ī somewhat detached, dispassionate tone can be particularly effective, in contrast to the more assertive, argumentative tone you might adopt for other types of essay question. Because of the exploratory nature of such essays, objectivity is key. Needless to say, your answer must be exploratory and thus it is imperative that you adopt a questioning approach when answering such questions. Coherence is extremely important in providing explanatory answers. Keep in mind any ‘what’, ‘how’ and ‘why’ questions as this will help you to structure a clear and logically coherent response. To provide as much detail as possible, and to give definitions for any jargon or key terms when used. When answering such questions, it helps to imagine you are writing for someone who knows absolutely nothing of the subject. ‘Explain’ questions expect you to basically clarify a topic. You are expected to discuss, in detail, with examples and arguments on the idea of pressure groups, lobbying in particular. ‘Although individuals within a representative democracy possess rights, allowing them to lobby parliamentarians and governments concerning pertinent issues, a collective approach can often exert more powerful pressure on decision makers, as well as consolidating a range of similar ideas and opinions into a cohesive format’. Here, you are required to provide a lot of detail and information on a topic or argument.Įg. You simply have to list the main issues it tries to address and the salient features. When describing something, you must provide thorough insight into the main characteristics of the topic in a very objective manner.Įg. Some say, there is also state sponsored terrorism. Mentioning examples to make it clear to the examiner always helps.įor example, the definition on terrorism, there are many different perspectives. If the definition is contested then make sure you mention that. If you don’t have a crisp clear and packed definition, then it will be hard for you to score in this question. Here, you must outline the precise meaning of the term being referred to. ![]() A much higher level of skill is clearly needed for attempting critical directives than for descriptive directives. They want you to analyse and evaluate the issue at hand. ![]() They want you to provide with information.Ĭritical directives, on the other hand, want you to go beyond providing information. You are representing the situation as it stands, without presenting any analysis or discussion. There are 2 kinds of directives – Descriptive directives and Critical directivesĭescriptive directives want you to primarily answer the 4Ws – what, where, who, when. ![]() Towards the end, we discuss their practical applicability. Presenting an exhaustive list to help clear all doubts – what do the ‘question directives’ mean from a pure english language perspective? How they can be incorporated in your Mains Answer Writing? In such a scenario, not having a deep understanding ‘ question directives‘ or ‘ tail words‘ can adversely impact your attempt. UPSC paper setters take a lot of time to frame questions and this is one of the main reasons we don’t find any of the other exams coming remotely closer to UPSC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |